Case 2302823/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Fellows v JFMerchants Ltd [DISSOLVED] — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302823/2019
- Decision date
- 20 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sudra Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Fellows
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the respondent, JFMerchants Ltd, had been dissolved and that the claimant had not applied to have it restored to the Register of Companies. On that basis, the judgment addressed whether the claim should proceed at all rather than determining the merits of any underlying complaint.
The tribunal also noted that on 9 March 2023 it had given the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason in response.
The claim was therefore struck out. The judgment is a short procedural decision and does not record any findings on the substance of the claim or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action; it only records that the claim was struck out. The gov.uk listing categorises the case under Working Time Regulations, but that is not stated in the judgment text itself. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.