Case 2302843/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Jackson v Berkeley Catering Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2302843/2018
- Decision date
- 17 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nash Representation
- Venue
- Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Jackson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was the remedy judgment following the claimant's successful unfair dismissal claim. At the remedy hearing on 15 January 2020 the parties agreed that compensation for loss of statutory rights should be £300, and they agreed that the compensatory award before any statutory cap would be £63,446.28. The only live issue at the later hearing in chambers on 14 February 2020 was whether the statutory maximum under section 124 Employment Rights Act 1996 was £66,000, as the claimant contended, or £54,000, as the respondent contended.
The tribunal held that the claimant's remuneration did not vary with the amount of work done for the purposes of section 221 ERA 1996, so the weekly pay calculation had to be based on her contractual pay excluding bonus. It accepted the respondent's reliance on Evans v Malley Organisation and rejected the claimant's attempt to distinguish that authority. The tribunal found that the bonus depended on the company's overall performance rather than the claimant's individual efforts alone, so there was a weaker link between her work and the remuneration than in the authorities relied on by the claimant.
The tribunal also rejected reliance on Lock v British Gas, holding that the domestic statutory wording in the unfair dismissal context was different from the EU-law-driven approach in the holiday pay cases. It further found that the claimant was not contractually entitled to a bonus, noting that the contract of employment referred to salary, that a bonus structure was introduced later, and that there was no contractual wording establishing a bonus right. The tribunal therefore capped the compensatory award at £54,000 based on the agreed gross annual salary exclusive of bonus.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Remedy judgment only. The tribunal held the compensatory award was capped at £54,000 after deciding the claimant's bonus/commission did not count for the statutory maximum calculation. The award included £300 for loss of statutory rights; there was no basic award. | Upheld | — | £54,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £54,000
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £54,000
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.124 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.221 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.229 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Evans v Malley Organisation [2002] EWCA Civ 1834
- Lock v British Gas [2016] EWCA Civ 98
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.