Case 2302859/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Salazar Laiz v Taylor Services/ Dominican Shipping — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302859/2023
- Decision date
- 22 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sudra Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Salazar Laiz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 16 June 2023. The respondent, Taylor Services/ Dominican Shipping, failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearing listed for 12 December 2023 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay Miss J Salazar Laiz £1,543 gross, and recorded that the claimant is responsible for any sums owed to HMRC for tax or national insurance contributions. The judgment states the total payable to the claimant is £1,543.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The judgment states the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and must pay £1,543 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,543 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,543
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.