Case 2302861/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Omonbo v Nella Cutlery South Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2302861/2019
- Decision date
- 22 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clarke
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Omonbo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr K Omonbo worked for Nella Cutlery South Ltd as an International Driver from 28 August 2018 until he resigned on 29 April 2019. The tribunal recorded that his unfair dismissal claim had already been struck out, and that at the hearing he was pursuing only a claim for unpaid overtime while the respondent pursued a counterclaim for overpaid holiday pay.
The tribunal held that the claimant was not entitled to be paid for the period spent driving home after his last customer of the day. On the evidence and contractual documents, his work finished when he completed the last customer, and the journey from there to home was treated as commuting rather than working time. The tribunal also found that overtime was only payable when authorised by the respondent. Although some overtime had clearly been authorised and paid, the claimant did not show that additional claimed hours had been authorised, and his own schedule was found to be inaccurate because he had rounded hours and had no independent records.
The tribunal rejected the claimant's assertion that all overtime was payable at £25 per hour. It found that the contract provided for overtime at £9.09 per hour, with a separate £25 flat rate for an additional overnight, and that the claimant had not identified any contractual document setting a general overtime rate of £25 per hour. On that basis, the unlawful deduction from wages claim failed.
On the counterclaim, the tribunal found that the claimant had taken 19 days' holiday in the 2019 holiday year, but had accrued only 8 days by the end of his employment. That meant he had taken 11 days more than accrued. The respondent had already deducted £799.92 from final pay, which covered 8 excess days rather than 11, so the tribunal ordered the claimant to repay the remaining overpayment of £299.97.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal noted that the unfair dismissal claim had been struck out by order dated 23 January 2020. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant's overtime/unlawful deduction claim failed because the tribunal found he was only entitled to payment for overtime authorised by the respondent, and that he had not shown additional authorised overtime beyond the hours already paid. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Counterclaim for overpaid holiday pay. The tribunal found the claimant had taken 11 days more holiday than accrued, but the termination deduction had already recovered only 8 days, leaving £299.97 repayable. | Upheld | — | £300 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £300
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 13(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 27 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 230(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 4 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England & Wales) Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.