Case 2302862/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Gallagher v Engie Services Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2302862/2018
- Decision date
- 1 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Gallagher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant.
No substantive findings on liability, evidence, or remedy are set out in the judgment text. The document does not identify the individual claims beyond the case metadata supplied separately.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment text does not list the pleaded causes of action. This claim type is inferred from the GOV.UK listing categories; the judgment itself only states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment text does not list the pleaded causes of action. This claim type is inferred from the GOV.UK listing categories; the judgment itself only states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment text does not list the pleaded causes of action. This claim type is inferred from the GOV.UK listing categories; the judgment itself only states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment text does not list the pleaded causes of action. This claim type is inferred from the GOV.UK listing categories; the judgment itself only states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment text does not list the pleaded causes of action. This claim type is inferred from the GOV.UK listing categories; the judgment itself only states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.