Case 2302863/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Voce v Team Hard Racing Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302863/2023
- Decision date
- 22 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Voce
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 17 June 2023 and the respondent did not present a valid response in time. The Employment Judge therefore determined the matter under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearing listed for 11 December 2023 was cancelled.
On the evidence before the tribunal, the respondent was found to have made unauthorised deductions from wages, so the claimant was awarded £3,447.20 net. The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £548.12 net in damages. In addition, it found that holiday entitlement had not been paid and awarded £274.10 net, and that terms and conditions of employment had not been provided, awarding £2,284.00 net. The total sum ordered was £6,553.42.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and awarded £3,447.20 net. | Upheld | — | £3,447 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £548.12 net in damages. | Upheld | — | £548 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £274.10 net. | Upheld | — | £274 |
| Other | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to provide the claimant with terms and conditions of employment and awarded £2,284.00 net. | Upheld | — | £2,284 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,553
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.