Case 2302882/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Taylor v Interview Hub Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2302882/2018
- Decision date
- 26 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Taylor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at London South found that Mr J Taylor's claim of unfair dismissal succeeded. It recorded that he was dismissed by reason of redundancy.
The tribunal ordered Interview Hub Ltd to pay £1,041.65 redundancy pay and £34,026 as compensation for unfair dismissal. The judgment does not break down the £34,026 into basic and compensatory elements, so the award is recorded here as compensation for unfair dismissal only, with the total award calculated from the two sums stated in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the Claimant's claim of unfair dismissal succeeded and stated that he was dismissed by reason of redundancy. | Upheld | — | £34,026 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay redundancy pay in the sum of £1,041.65 after finding that the Claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy. | Upheld | — | £1,042 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £35,068
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £34,026
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.