Case 2302882/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Allira Johnston v STR 48 Limited T/A Antipodea — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302882/2023
- Decision date
- 13 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Richter REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Allira Johnston
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Croydon CVP hearing on 13 December 2023, Employment Judge Richter heard the claim with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent making no appearance. The tribunal held that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded in respect of the period 5 February 2023 to 19 March 2023, and ordered payment of the gross sum deducted, £313.50.
The tribunal also held that the holiday pay complaint was well-founded because the respondent had failed to pay the claimant for holidays accrued but not taken when her employment ended. It ordered the respondent to pay £360.84 in addition to the sum awarded for wages. The written record states that the claimant is responsible for any tax or National Insurance on the payments.
The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. No broader findings, legal tests, or separate remedy components were set out in the written record beyond the two sums awarded for wages and holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 5 February 2023 to 19 March 2023 and awarded the gross sum deducted. | Upheld | — | £314 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages arising from failure to pay holiday accrued but untaken on termination, and awarded the additional sum stated by the tribunal. | Upheld | — | £361 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £674
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.