Case 2302885/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S M Bach v Andrew & Law Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302885/2020
- Decision date
- 1 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Self Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S M Bach
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 1 April 2022, Employment Judge Self recorded that the claims of ordinary unfair dismissal, redundancy payment, age discrimination and indirect sex discrimination were dismissed upon withdrawal. The record does not contain any substantive liability findings on the pleaded issues, and it records no remedy calculation or award.
The hearing was conducted by telephone in London South. The only outcome recorded in the judgment is that the claims were withdrawn and therefore dismissed; no further reasons, admissions, or tribunal findings are set out in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded as ordinary unfair dismissal; the judgment states the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states the redundancy payment claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The judgment states the age discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Sex discrimination | Recorded as indirect sex discrimination; the judgment states the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.