Case 2302889/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Wadey v Green Cross Recruitment — 2020
- Case reference
- 2302889/2019
- Decision date
- 22 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Wadey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Respondent did not present a response and did not attend the hearing. The Tribunal therefore determined the claim on the basis of the material before it and found that the Respondent had acted in breach of contract and had made unauthorised deductions from the Claimant's wages.
On that first finding, the Tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay a gross sum of £6,831.86. The judgment sets out the components of that sum as unpaid salary for May and June 2019 (£3,455.31), unpaid commissions for April, May and June 2019 (£1,288.76), unpaid pension contributions (£94.89), unpaid expenses (£69.80), unpaid notice pay for three weeks (£2,019.24), and unpaid annual leave (£403.86), less £500 already received. The Tribunal also stated that the Claimant is responsible for any tax and national insurance due on the sums awarded.
The Tribunal further found that the Respondent had failed to provide the Claimant with a written statement of terms and conditions and ordered payment of £2,100.00. The judgment does not give any separate breakdown for that award. No discrimination, whistleblowing, redundancy, unfair dismissal, or working time findings appear in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The Tribunal held that the Respondent acted in breach of contract, but the judgment does not split the £6,831.86 award between this head and the unlawful deductions finding. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal held that the Respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages, but the £6,831.86 award was not apportioned as between this head and breach of contract. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of terms and conditions. The Tribunal ordered payment of £2,100.00. | Upheld | — | £2,100 |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.