Case 2302896/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Tombini v StreetTeam Software Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302896/2022
- Decision date
- 9 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hart Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Tombini
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the respondent name from 'StreetTeam Software Limited' to 'StreetTeam Software Limited (in administration)'. The hearing was conducted orally before Employment Judge Hart, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent not attending.
On the substantive claims, the tribunal stayed the claim for unauthorised deduction of wages relating to non-payment of expenses quantified at £1,546.59 for 6 months. It therefore made no final decision on that claim in this judgment.
The separate claim for unauthorised deduction of wages in relation to failure to pay 1 day's wages was dismissed upon withdrawal. The holiday pay claim under the Working Time Regulations 1998 and/or the Employment Rights Act 1996 was also dismissed upon withdrawal. The written record notes that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim in relation to non-payment of expenses amounting to £1,546.59; the tribunal stayed the claim for 6 months and did not make a final determination in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim in relation to failure to pay 1 day's wages; dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim under the Working Time Regulations 1998 and/or the Employment Rights Act 1996; dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.