Case 2302934/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Helena Amofa v Olivers Mill Cleaning & Maintenance LLP — 2021
- Case reference
- 2302934/2020
- Decision date
- 7 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clarke
- Venue
- London South Tribunal
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Helena Amofa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Clarke, sitting alone at London South Tribunal on 5 July 2021, struck out Ms Helena Amofa’s unfair dismissal claim because she did not have two years’ qualifying service. The Tribunal recorded that it therefore lacked jurisdiction to deal with that claim.
The Tribunal also found that Olivers Mill Cleaning & Maintenance LLP was in breach of contract when it dismissed Ms Amofa without notice. It ordered the Respondent to pay £7,500 gross as damages for the breach of contract and noted, under Rule 69, that the Respondent should account to HMRC if able to do so, otherwise the Claimant must account to HMRC.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the Claimant did not have two years' qualifying service and the Tribunal lacked jurisdiction to deal with the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The Tribunal found that the Respondent breached contract by dismissing the Claimant without notice and awarded gross damages of £7,500. | Upheld | — | £7,500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.