Case 2302936/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Gheorghe Zait v Accurate Fixing Solutions Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2302936/2023
- Decision date
- 31 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Yardley Representation
- Venue
- By CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Gheorghe Zait
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claim by CVP on 31 October 2023 before Employment Judge Yardley. The claimant, Mr Gheorghe Zait, appeared in person and was assisted by Dana Dima interpreting in Romanian. The respondent, Accurate Fixing Solutions Limited, was represented by Ms Gabriela Burlacu, its managing director.
The tribunal held that Mr Zait was not an employee or worker of the respondent at the relevant time. On that basis, it concluded that the unlawful deduction of wages claim could not be determined because the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear it.
The only recorded outcome was dismissal of the unlawful deduction of wages claim. The judgment does not record any monetary award or any other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the claimant was not an employee or worker of the respondent at the relevant time, so the unlawful deduction of wages claim was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.