Case 2302942/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Andrea Gabriele Bidotti v Mimosa Foods Ltd in liquidation — 2021
- Case reference
- 2302942/2019
- Decision date
- 1 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Keogh Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Andrea Gabriele Bidotti
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAndrea Gabriele Bidotti brought claims for unlawful deductions from wages and for failure to pay holiday pay. At a case management hearing on 23 November 2020, Employment Judge Street ordered him to provide further particulars of claim, including a schedule of the exact sums claimed, payslips, comments on the liquidator's documents, and a list of holiday days taken between 1 October 2018 and 24 April 2019.
No correspondence was received from the Claimant and the orders were not complied with. At the final hearing on 1 February 2021, neither party attended or was represented, and the tribunal had no bundle or witness statements. In the absence of the requested information and any agreement from the Respondent or the Liquidator, Employment Judge Keogh said it was not possible to ascertain what sums might be due. The claims were therefore struck out for failure to comply with the order and for not being actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Struck out for failure to comply with the orders made on 23 November 2020 and for not being actively pursued; no sums could be ascertained on the evidence available. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Struck out for failure to comply with the orders made on 23 November 2020 and for not being actively pursued; no sums could be ascertained on the evidence available. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.