Case 2302946/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Campbell v Compass Group UK & Ireland Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2302946/2019
- Decision date
- 8 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Campbell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr M Campbell brought proceedings against Compass Group UK and Ireland Limited.
The proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. No findings on the merits or remedy were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. The specific pleaded claims are not identified in the judgment text; this classification follows the listing hint only. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. The specific pleaded claims are not identified in the judgment text; this classification follows the listing hint only. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. The specific pleaded claims are not identified in the judgment text; this classification follows the listing hint only. | Withdrawn | Sexual orientation | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the Claimant. The specific pleaded claims are not identified in the judgment text; this classification follows the listing hint only. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.