Case 2302946/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Monir Nasseredine v Safetycare (UK) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2302946/2020
- Decision date
- 24 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Abbott
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Monir Nasseredine
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Monir Nasseredine brought a claim against Safetycare (UK) Ltd in the London South Employment Tribunal. Employment Judge Abbott, sitting alone on 24 June 2021, held that the claim succeeded and that the Claimant had been unfairly dismissed.
The written record states that the Respondent was ordered to pay compensation of £88,519. The judgment does not provide a written explanation of the factual findings or a breakdown of that sum into basic award, compensatory award, or interest.
The notes state that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. On the face of the written judgment, the only recorded liability finding is unfair dismissal, with the compensation figure as the only recorded remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records a single award of compensation in the sum of £88,519 and does not split the amount between basic and compensatory award heads. | Upheld | — | £88,519 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £88,519
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.