Case 2302955/2020 · Employment Tribunal
E Kyeremateng v At Medics/Primary Care — 2022
- Case reference
- 2302955/2020
- Decision date
- 6 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Burge Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E Kyeremateng
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 6 September 2022, at the London South Employment Tribunal, Employment Judge L Burge recorded that the matter had been listed for the first day of a three-day final hearing but had been converted to a two-hour preliminary hearing because the case was not ready. The claimant had not complied with earlier case management orders requiring a schedule of loss, disclosure, participation in the hearing bundle, and witness statements, and she did not attend the hearing despite knowing the date and that it had been converted.
The tribunal noted that the claimant had not corresponded with the respondent’s solicitors since they were instructed on 23 July 2022, had not contacted the tribunal to explain her absence, and did not answer the telephone or respond to email when the tribunal tried to contact her on the day. The judge found that she was not actively pursuing her claims.
Applying Schedule 1, Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 and the overriding objective, the tribunal dismissed the claim for non-attendance. No substantive findings were made on the underlying race discrimination, unfair dismissal, or working time issues, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Dismissed under Rule 47 for non-attendance; the tribunal made no substantive findings on the race discrimination complaint. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed under Rule 47 for non-attendance; the tribunal made no substantive findings on the unfair dismissal complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Dismissed under Rule 47 for non-attendance; the tribunal made no substantive findings on the working time complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Schedule 1, Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.