Case 2302981/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Poku v NHS Croydon Clinical Commissioning Group and 2 others — 2020
- Case reference
- 2302981/2019
- Decision date
- 14 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sage Representation
- Venue
- London South Croydon
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Miss C Poku
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment records that Miss C Poku brought claims against NHS Croydon Clinical Commissioning Group, Ms Alison O’Grady and Ms Rachel Colley. It states only that the claimant’s claims were dismissed. No further factual findings, legal analysis, or remedy assessment are set out in the written record provided.
The decision notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless requested within 14 days. On the extracted text available here, the tribunal did not publish any written explanation of why the claims failed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment does not specify the pleaded cause(s) of action; this classification is inferred from the GOV.UK listing, which identifies disability discrimination. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The written judgment does not specify the pleaded cause(s) of action; this classification is inferred from the GOV.UK listing, which identifies race discrimination. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.