Case 2302985/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J. Sherman v H &AB-Side Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2302985/2020
- Decision date
- 6 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T.R.
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J. Sherman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt London South on 6 September 2021, before Employment Judge T.R. Smith, the tribunal recorded that the claimant, Mr J. Sherman, was appearing in person and the respondent was represented by its director. The written judgment contains two substantive disposals only: the claimant’s complaint under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to give a statement of employment particulars, and his complaint of detriment arising from a protected disclosure.
Both complaints were dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment does not record findings on the underlying merits of either claim, and it does not identify any remedy because no award was made.
The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. On the face of the written decision, there are no panel members listed and no additional legal tests or findings set out in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Complaint under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 (failure to give a statement of employment particulars); dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Complaint of detriment arising from a protected disclosure; dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.