Case 2302996/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Tunstead v L Kelaty Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 2302996/2017
- Decision date
- 5 March 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Tunstead
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in the Employment Tribunals. The judgment records that the claimant was Mr S Tunstead and the respondent was L Kelaty Limited. It does not set out any substantive findings on liability beyond the standard Rule 21 wording.
The tribunal stated that the claim succeeds and that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing if required. The hearing listed for 8 March 2018 was cancelled. No remedy figures are recorded in the extracted text.
The extracted judgment text does not identify the individual heads of claim or any legal reasoning beyond the Rule 21 disposal. On that basis, the outcome is recorded as a successful claim with remedy left to a later hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 21 judgment states that the claim succeeds, but the extracted text does not identify the substantive head(s) of claim or any split between heads. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.