Case 2303008/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v The Governing Body Of Wincheap Foundation Primary School and Kent County Council — 2024
- Case reference
- 2303008/2023
- Decision date
- 8 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews Preliminary
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing held by video on 8 August 2024 before Acting Regional Employment Judge Andrews, the Tribunal recorded the parties and representation for Miss J Pinna, the Governing Body of Wincheap Foundation Primary School, and Kent County Council. The extracted judgment contains no substantive findings on liability for the underlying claims.
The only disposal recorded in the judgment is that the claim against the second respondent, Kent County Council, was dismissed upon withdrawal. The text does not specify any separate remedy, liability apportionment, or findings on the merits of the claim as against that respondent.
No legal tests are stated in the extracted text, and no lay members are listed. The judgment is limited to the withdrawal-based dismissal of the claim against the second respondent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claim against the second respondent, Kent County Council, was dismissed upon withdrawal at a preliminary hearing on 8 August 2024. No substantive merits decision is recorded in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.