Case 2303012/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. G. Walker v The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development — 2019
- Case reference
- 2303012/2018
- Decision date
- 2 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sage Representation
- Venue
- London South Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. G. Walker
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment, heard at London South Croydon on 2 December 2019 before Employment Judge Sage, records that Mr G Walker's claim against The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development was struck out under rule 37(1)(b) of the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The extracted text does not set out the substantive claims, factual background, or any findings on liability. It therefore records no determination on the merits and no monetary award.
Because the judgment contains only the strike-out order, the public record extracted here is limited to the procedural outcome. No protected characteristic, remedy breakdown, or separate claim outcome is stated in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment states only that the claimant's claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(b); it does not identify any underlying cause(s) of action. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(b) Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.