Case 2303012/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Carman v The Concrete and Corrosion Consultancy Practice Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2303012/2024
- Decision date
- 14 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Carman
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr R Carman, brought a claim for unlawful deduction of wages against The Concrete and Corrosion Consultancy Practice Ltd. The tribunal dismissed the claim, finding it was not well-founded.
The tribunal recorded that, following the open preliminary hearing on 15 November 2024 and subsequent case management orders, the respondent produced outstanding sick leave and annual leave records to justify how the claimant had been paid. The claimant did not respond to show otherwise and did not comply with the orders.
On the material before it, the tribunal considered that the respondent's documentation showed there was no outstanding pay due to the claimant. The matter was dealt with on the papers, with no objection from the claimant to that approach.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim not well-founded. It proceeded on the papers after an open preliminary hearing on 15 November 2024 and later case management orders. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.