Case 2303013/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E A Groza v WB Chambers Farms Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2303013/2024
- Decision date
- 3 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mclaren Members
- Panel members
- Mrs S. Dengate, Mr. D Newlyn
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs E A Groza
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at London South by CVP on 1-2 October 2025 before Employment Judge Mclaren with lay members Mrs S. Dengate and Mr D Newlyn, dealt with a complaint described in the judgment as direct discrimination. The claimant did not attend. The respondent was represented by J. The tribunal’s unanimous decision was to strike out the complaint.
The judgment states that the strike-out was made under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(c) because the claimant had not complied with tribunal rules or a tribunal order, and under Rule 38(1)(d) because the claim had not been actively pursued. The written record also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
No remedy or monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment refers to a complaint of direct discrimination, but the extracted text does not identify the protected characteristic. The tribunal struck the complaint out under Rule 38(1)(c) for non-compliance with tribunal rules or an order and under Rule 38(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(c)
- Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.