Case 2303015/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Steven Beveridge v Strawberry Star Developments Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2303015/2023
- Decision date
- 21 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge N Cox Date
- Venue
- LONDON SOUTH Remotely via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Steven Beveridge
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South remotely via CVP on 21 December 2023 before Employment Judge N Cox sitting alone. The tribunal dismissed the complaint of unpaid holiday pay, recording that it was not well-founded.
The tribunal upheld the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in the period November 2022 to 30 April 2023.
As remedy, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £38,621.81 net and stated that tax and National Insurance had already been accounted for. It also ordered a further £3,260 to compensate the claimant for financial loss attributable to the unauthorised deduction, making a total award of £41,881.81.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The complaint of unpaid holiday pay was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for the period November 2022 to 30 April 2023. It ordered payment of £38,621.81 net and a further £3,260 for financial loss attributable to the deduction. | Upheld | — | £41,882 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £41,882
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,260
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.