Case 2303015/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Perry v Everything Trading Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2303015/2024
- Decision date
- 28 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fitzgerald Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Perry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 27 and 28 January 2025 before Employment Judge Fitzgerald, the respondent admitted the claimant's claims for unlawful deduction of wages and holiday pay. The tribunal ordered payment of £1,526.53 gross for unlawful deductions relating to 2 February 2024 to 2 March 2024, and £322.39 gross for holiday pay. The respondent was permitted to apply any necessary payroll deductions before payment was made.
The claimant's claim of automatic unfair dismissal based on asserting a statutory right was unsuccessful and was dismissed. Separately, the tribunal found that when the proceedings commenced the respondent was in breach of its duty to give the claimant a written statement of particulars, and it made an award of two weeks' pay of £677.30 gross without deduction. The judgment records total gross sums payable of £2,526.22.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Succeeded upon admission by the respondent; related to the period 2 February 2024 to 2 March 2024. | Upheld | — | £1,527 |
| Holiday pay | Succeeded upon admission by the respondent. | Upheld | — | £322 |
| Unfair dismissal | Automatic unfair dismissal based on asserting a statutory right. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent was in breach of its duty to give the claimant a written statement of particulars when proceedings commenced and made an award of 2 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £677 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,526
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.