Case 2303017/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Attenborough v Dr Hazim Taki — 2023
- Case reference
- 2303017/2023
- Decision date
- 22 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sudra Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Attenborough
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 26 June 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Sudra Date determined that a decision could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 without a merits hearing. The hearing listed for 5 December 2023 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It awarded damages of £405.00 gross and ordered the respondent to pay £405.00 in total. The judgment also records that the claimant is responsible for any sums owed to HMRC for tax or national insurance contributions.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £405.00 gross damages. The respondent had not presented a valid response on time, so the matter was determined under rule 21. | Upheld | — | £405 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £405
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.