Case 2303026/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Dhamu v Imonitor - Anthony Nartey — 2024
- Case reference
- 2303026/2023
- Decision date
- 17 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Dhamu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 14 August 2024, the Tribunal gave Mr N Dhamu an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that he had not attended the hearing on 2 January 2024, had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 2 January 2024, and had not actively pursued the claim.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. In those circumstances, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment records no substantive determination of the pleaded causes of action and no monetary award.
The judgment is dated 17 September 2024 and is signed by Employment Judge Tsamados Date.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause(s) of action. It records only that the claim was struck out after the claimant did not attend the hearing on 2 January 2024, did not comply with the Tribunal's order of 2 January 2024, and had not actively pursued the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.