Case 2303030/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Christiana Jiwemeto v Greenwrite Healthcare Limited Heard: By CVP in London South — 2023
- Case reference
- 2303030/2022
- Decision date
- 3 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Codd Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Christiana Jiwemeto
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a CVP hearing in London South on 3 March 2023, Employment Judge Codd recorded that neither party attended. The tribunal made a Rule 37 judgment and struck out the application.
The reasons given were that the claimant had not produced an ACAS early conciliation certificate, the claim was unreasonable because it was incomprehensible, and the claim had not been actively pursued. No remedy was awarded. The written record also stated that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written reasons do not restate the substantive cause of action. This classification follows the gov.uk listing category for the case. The tribunal struck out the application under Rule 37 because no ACAS early conciliation certificate was produced, the claim was unreasonable because it was incomprehensible, and it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37 Employment Tribunals Rules and Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.