Case 2303032/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Pegram v Pan Haus Hospitality Ltd (in Compulsory Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2303032/2024
- Decision date
- 12 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Taylor Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Pegram
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Pan Haus Hospitality Ltd was in compulsory liquidation and that permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to continue, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986. On that basis, the tribunal said the claim could not proceed.
The tribunal also noted that on 12 February 2025 the claimant was given 14 days to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason. The claim was therefore struck out.
No substantive merits were determined and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying substantive claim type. The claim was struck out because the respondent company was in compulsory liquidation and permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to continue, and because the claimant failed to give an acceptable reason after being given an opportunity to do so. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.