Case 2303053/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. P. W. McLoughlin v Apcoa Parking Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2303053/2022
- Decision date
- 8 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sudra Sitting
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Miss Murphy, Dr Westwood
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. P. W. McLoughlin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at London South on 4 and 5 January 2024 before Employment Judge Sudra, sitting with Tribunal Members Miss Murphy and Dr Westwood. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms Barney, a consultant.
The written judgment records that the claimant's claims of automatic unfair dismissal and direct race discrimination were dismissed. The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and does not include written reasons explaining the tribunal's reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment describes this as a claim of automatic unfair dismissal and records that it was dismissed. No written reasons are included in the supplied judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment describes this as a claim of direct race discrimination and records that it was dismissed. No written reasons are included in the supplied judgment text. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.