Case 2303056/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Jackson v Newjohn Retailer (walton) Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2303056/2022
- Decision date
- 28 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Jackson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 30 August 2022. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge dealt with the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On the breach of contract claim, the tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,004.75 gross. On the redundancy pay claim, the tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,004.78 gross.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £4,009.53 in total. No other remedies were identified in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment; damages awarded for notice pay, gross amount. | Upheld | — | £2,005 |
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment; tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a gross redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £2,005 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,010
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.