Case 2303058/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Tank v Threads International Limited (dissolved) and 2 others — 2019
- Case reference
- 2303058/2018
- Decision date
- 19 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pritchard Representation
- Venue
- Ashford
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mrs D Tank
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 19 July 2019 at Ashford, Employment Judge Pritchard recorded that the First Respondent had been dissolved on 16 July 2019 and was dismissed from the proceedings. The Third Respondent was described as a trading name for the First Respondent and was also dismissed from the proceedings. The Second Respondent accepted that the claimant's employment transferred under the Transfer of Undertakings Regulations 2006 and that, for statutory purposes, her continuous employment began on 26 November 2017.
The judgment records that the claimant's public interest disclosure claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. It also records a consent order by which the Second Respondent was to pay the claimant £264.52 in settlement of her claims under the case number. The judgment does not identify the underlying claims covered by that settlement order.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment refers to this as the claimant's public interest disclosure claim and says it was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | By consent, the Second Respondent was ordered to pay £264.52 in settlement of the claimant's claims under this case number; the judgment does not specify which underlying causes of action were included in the settlement. | Settled | — | £265 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £265
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.