Case 2303067/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Kelly Burbery v Childcare and Learning Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2303067/2023
- Decision date
- 23 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Fowell Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Kelly Burbery
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld the claimant's claim of constructive unfair dismissal against Childcare and Learning Limited. The judgment records that the claimant was awarded compensation of £11,553.50 in total.
The award was broken down into a basic award of £8,680.50 and a compensatory award of £2,873. The compensatory award included £500 for loss of statutory rights.
The tribunal also recorded that there was no breach of contract by the respondent and no unlawful deduction of wages. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, so the operative findings and award are set out in summary form only.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £11,554 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,554
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £8,681
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,873
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.