Case 2303069/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Darracott v Samantha Denham Solicitors — 2019
- Case reference
- 2303069/2018
- Decision date
- 19 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan
- Venue
- Ashford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Darracott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Corrigan, sitting alone in Ashford on 13 June 2019. The claimant, Mr T Darracott, appeared in person and the respondent, Samantha Denham Solicitors, was represented by Mr P Tapsell, Counsel.
The judgment records that the claimant's claims for non payment of the Minimum Wage and sex discrimination were dismissed upon withdrawal. No substantive findings on liability were made because the claims were withdrawn before determination.
The judgment does not record any monetary award, and no remedy was assessed or ordered.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment refers to a claim for non payment of the Minimum Wage, which is not separately classified in the locked claim_type enum. It was dismissed upon withdrawal at the preliminary hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The sex discrimination claim was dismissed upon withdrawal at the preliminary hearing. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.