Case 2303079/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Peek v Prepared People Limited Heard: By CVP (London South) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2303079/2023
- Decision date
- 10 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McAvoy Newns
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Peek
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined the matter as a Rule 21 judgment because no response had been presented by the respondent in time, no formal application for permission to extend time had been made, and the respondent did not attend the hearing.
The claimant's complaints of unauthorised deduction from wages, covering wages and holiday pay, and breach of contract, covering notice pay and expenses, succeeded. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,351.31, with the claimant responsible for any income tax or national insurance contributions due on that sum.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the unauthorised deduction from wages complaint succeeded in respect of wages, but does not split the award by claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the unauthorised deduction from wages complaint succeeded in respect of holiday pay, but does not split the award by claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the breach of contract complaint succeeded in respect of notice pay and expenses, but does not split the award by claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,351
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 judgment
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.