Case 2303083/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Gardiner v Amalgamated Lifts Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2303083/2019
- Decision date
- 5 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Representation
- Venue
- Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Gardiner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim before Employment Judge Fowell was for unlawful deduction from wages. The hearing took place on 5 February 2020 at Croydon, and neither Mr M Gardiner nor Amalgamated Lifts Limited attended. The tribunal noted that notice of hearing had been sent to both parties on 23 September 2019, with the respondent having returned a completed response form on 21 October 2019.
The tribunal recorded that the respondent’s named contact, Mr Brand, had overlooked the notice of hearing and had not understood that further action was required. It also found that the claimant had not given his address or phone number on the claim form, instead mistakenly providing the respondent’s contact details, although his address was later obtained from the ACAS early conciliation certificate so that notice could be served.
The notice of hearing had directed the claimant to provide a written statement of the compensation sought and any supporting evidence or documentation, but none was received. After considering rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure and making the enquiries that were practicable, the tribunal dismissed the claim. The tribunal said that, despite both parties failing to attend, it remained for the claimant to pursue the claim and he had failed to do so.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Neither party attended the hearing. The tribunal considered rule 47 after making enquiries, noted that no written compensation schedule or supporting evidence had been provided, and dismissed the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.