Case 2303083/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Kevin Bannister v Thamesway Transport Services Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2303083/2023
- Decision date
- 24 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados Members
- Panel members
- Mr S Khan, Mr J Hutchings
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Kevin Bannister
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal unanimously held that Mr Kevin Bannister's complaint of unfair dismissal against Thamesway Transport Services Ltd was well-founded.
The Tribunal also held that his complaint for damages for breach of contract, concerning entitlement to 4 weeks' payment in lieu of notice, was well-founded. The parties were directed to advise the Tribunal by 5 December 2025 if they required a remedy hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment states that the complaint of unfair dismissal is well-founded. Reasons were given orally and no remedy figure is stated in the written record. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The written judgment states that the complaint of damages for breach of contract in respect of entitlement to 4 weeks' payment in lieu of notice is well-founded. No monetary award is stated in the written record. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.