Case 2303084/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Gerring v Ms Louise Green — 2020
- Case reference
- 2303084/2019
- Decision date
- 14 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pritchard Representation
- Venue
- Ashford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Gerring
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Miss J Gerring, brought complaints arising from deductions from wages and the absence of itemised pay statements. The respondent, Ms Louise Green, did not appear at the hearing on 22 November 2019. Employment Judge Pritchard corrected the written judgment on 14 July 2020 to show the case number.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £3,907.18. No separate breakdown of that sum was given in the judgment, and no other monetary remedy was recorded.
The tribunal also found that the respondent failed to provide itemised pay statements contrary to section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for three periods: May 2017 to end February 2018, 16 June 2018 to 12 November 2018, and 22 February 2019 to 24 April 2019. The judgment records this finding but does not set out any separate award for that issue.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £3,907.18 for unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £3,907 |
| Other | The tribunal also found that the respondent failed to provide itemised pay statements contrary to section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 during May 2017 to end February 2018, 16 June 2018 to 12 November 2018, and 22 February 2019 to 24 April 2019. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,907
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.