Case 2303090/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Ely v Marken Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2303090/2024
- Decision date
- 26 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Ely
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at London South by video on 20 and 21 February 2025 and 25 and 26 June 2025 before Employment Judge Russell. By consent and pursuant to an agreement reached between the parties, Ms S Ely's claim was dismissed in its entirety following withdrawal by the Claimant.
The short written record does not set out the underlying factual allegations, any liability findings, or any monetary award. It records only the procedural disposal of the case.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not separately identify this claim; the type is taken from the supplied listing category. It records that the claim was dismissed in its entirety following withdrawal by the Claimant, by consent. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not separately identify this claim; the type is taken from the supplied listing category. It records that the claim was dismissed in its entirety following withdrawal by the Claimant, by consent. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not separately identify this claim; the type is taken from the supplied listing category. It records that the claim was dismissed in its entirety following withdrawal by the Claimant, by consent. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.