Case 2303096/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Khetani v Bryen Langley Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2303096/2019
- Decision date
- 17 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pritchard Representation
- Venue
- Ashford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Khetani
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Ashford on 17 January 2020 before Employment Judge Pritchard. The written record states that the respondent's employer's contract claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. The wording indicates that the respondent withdrew that claim, and the tribunal recorded it as dismissed following that withdrawal.
The claimant's holiday pay claim was dismissed. No monetary award was made, and the judgment does not record any split or separate remedy figures for either claim.
The note to the judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No further factual findings or legal tests are set out in the written record provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the Respondent's employer's contract claim was 'dismissed upon withdrawal'. The wording suggests the claim had been withdrawn, so the outcome is recorded as withdrawn rather than dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.