Case 2303102/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Messi v 1, Croydon Logistics Limited 2, Ms Helen Clift 3, Ms Julie Chambers 4, Ms Danielle Small 5, Ms Faye Ansell — 2019
- Case reference
- 2303102/2017
- Decision date
- 23 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Freer Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Messi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn case numbers 2303102/2017, 2303470/2017 and 2300962/2018, Miss S Messi was listed against Croydon Logistics Limited and the individual respondents. The tribunal recorded that the complaints of disability discrimination and unlawful deduction of wages were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant.
The judgment also recorded that the Claimant’s remaining claim(s) would proceed to hearing on 23 April 2019 for seven days. No monetary award was made in this judgment and no merits findings were set out in relation to the withdrawn complaints.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the disability discrimination complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the unlawful deduction of wages complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.