Case 2303121/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Mr R Murray v London General Transport Services Ltd — 2023

Case reference: 2303121/2022
Decision date: 22 March 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Abbott Representation
Venue: London South

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr R Murray

Respondent

London General Transport Services Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal gave judgment on time limits after a hearing at London South Employment Tribunal by CVP on 22 March 2023. It dismissed the claim in its entirety because it found that it did not have jurisdiction to hear any of the complaints brought by the claimant.

The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing. It does not provide written reasons or a breakdown of findings by individual complaint. The hearings listed for 14 August 2023 and 19-22 March 2024 were vacated.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	Dismissed on time limits/jurisdiction; the written judgment does not set out separate reasoning for this complaint.	Dismissed	—	—
Breach of contract	Dismissed on time limits/jurisdiction; the written judgment does not set out separate reasoning for this complaint.	Dismissed	—	—
Disability discrimination	Dismissed on time limits/jurisdiction; the written judgment does not set out separate reasoning for this complaint.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Working time regulations	Dismissed on time limits/jurisdiction; the written judgment does not set out separate reasoning for this complaint.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.