Case 2303123/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Andrew v KodyPay — 2022
- Case reference
- 2303123/2022
- Decision date
- 7 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Andrew
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 5 September 2022. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Wright decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 without the listed hearing proceeding. The hearing listed for 22 February 2023 was cancelled.
On the merits, the tribunal found that KodyPay had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered it to pay £400 gross. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £3,295.35. The total sum ordered was £3,695.35.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £400 gross. | Upheld | — | £400 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £3,295.35. | Upheld | — | £3,295 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,695
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.