Case 2303124/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Grabowska v Skylane Hotel Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2303124/2020
- Decision date
- 3 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Cheetham QC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Grabowska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered only the Claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal. It recorded that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a Claimant to have not less than two years' service in order to bring an unfair dismissal complaint.
The tribunal found that Ms K Grabowska had been employed by Skylane Hotel Limited for less than two years. On that basis, it concluded that she was not entitled to bring the unfair dismissal complaint.
The complaint of unfair dismissal was therefore struck out. The judgment also states that the Claimant's other complaints were not affected by this judgment, but no further determination of those complaints appears in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 required two years' service, found the Claimant had less than two years' service, and struck out the unfair dismissal complaint. The judgment states that the Claimant's other complaints were not affected by this judgment, but they are not determined in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.