Case 2303150/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A.I. Popa v APC Care Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2303150/2021
- Decision date
- 5 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smith Date
- Venue
- London South via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A.I. Popa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing at London South via CVP on 5 May 2022, Employment Judge T.R. Smith recorded that the claimant’s complaints of ordinary unfair dismissal, race discrimination, sexual orientation discrimination, and pregnancy or maternity discrimination had no reasonable prospect of success. The claims were therefore struck out at the hearing stage.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by a party within 14 days. No remedy was awarded because the claims did not proceed beyond strike-out.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | Sexual orientation | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.