Case 2303173/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Not in attendance For the v Mr C Pullen, Vice Chairman — 2022
- Case reference
- 2303173/2021
- Decision date
- 20 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harrington BETWEEN
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Not in attendance For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South Employment Tribunal on 20 May 2022 before Employment Judge Harrington. The Claimant, Miss T Pizzie, did not attend. The Respondent, Merstham Football & Social Club Limited, was represented by Mr C Pullen, Vice Chairman.
The tribunal struck out the Claimant’s claim pursuant to Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, Schedule 1. The extracted written record does not set out the substantive basis for the strike out beyond that procedural disposal.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record. No monetary award was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive claim type; this classification follows the gov.uk listing category for the case. The claim was struck out under Rule 37. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, Schedule 1
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.