Case 2303182/2020 · Employment Tribunal
K Hrabovsky v Marenka Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2303182/2020
- Decision date
- 12 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Burge Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
K Hrabovsky
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant had worked for the respondent since 2012 as a kitchen porter/prep chef and there was no written contract of employment. At a disagreement on 15 March 2020, the tribunal found that he said "I quit!" and later that same day confirmed to the owners that he had meant to resign. The tribunal accepted that he did not communicate any retraction of that resignation, either orally or in writing, before later correspondence in April 2020.
The tribunal considered whether the resignation was immediate or with notice. It found that both sides understood there was a notice period: the respondent had drafted a letter referring to four weeks' notice, the claimant continued to send fit notes, and the tribunal concluded that a reasonable notice period in the circumstances was six weeks. Applying that notice period, the tribunal found that the employment ended on 26 April 2020, not on 15 March 2020 or 6 April 2020.
On that basis, the unfair dismissal claim failed because the claimant had resigned rather than been dismissed. The tribunal also referred to the respondent's emails of 22 and 28 April 2020 asking whether he intended to resign and saying he would be processed as a leaver if no response was received; it found that the claimant did not use those opportunities to say he wished to stay employed.
The tribunal further held, at this preliminary hearing, that the breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages claims were presented in time and could proceed. It did not decide those claims on their merits, and no monetary remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal found the claimant resigned on 15 March 2020, with an implied notice period, so there was no dismissal for unfair dismissal purposes. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held this claim was presented in time and could proceed. It did not determine the merits at this hearing. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held this claim was presented in time and could proceed. It did not determine the merits at this hearing. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- Article 7 of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order
- s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.111 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Palmer v Southend on Sea BC
- Sothern v Franks Charlesly and Co
- Sovereign House Security Services Ltd v Savage
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.