Case 2303185/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Maven v Greenfinches Propity Developments — 2021
- Case reference
- 2303185/2018
- Decision date
- 10 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Maven
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike-out judgment under rule 37. The Tribunal sent a letter dated 30/04/2021 giving the claimant an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 21/01/2021 and because the case had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Ferguson ordered that the claim be struck out on 10 June 2021. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claim or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim types. It records that the claim was struck out under rule 37 because the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 21/01/2021 and had not actively pursued the case. After a letter dated 30/04/2021 inviting representations or a request for a hearing, the claimant did not respond. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.