Case 2303190/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jaroslaw Dekert v Fluid Options UK Limited t/a Fluid Hygiene — 2021
- Case reference
- 2303190/2020
- Decision date
- 23 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Clarke
- Venue
- London South Tribunal
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Jaroslaw Dekert
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge Clarke sitting alone at London South Tribunal on 23 July 2021. The respondent’s name was amended to Fluid Options UK Limited t/a Fluid Hygiene. The claimant appeared in person with a Polish interpreter and the respondent was represented by Mr Matthew Gregson.
The tribunal upheld the claimant’s unlawful deduction from wages claim. It found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £2,000.02 in respect of the amount unlawfully deducted. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; the written judgment records that written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,000.02. | Upheld | — | £2,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.